what if this interchange was an extension to amk int, since both are found in ang mo kio estate. If thats the case:
– shift services 22, 45, 73, 265, 268 here
– shift service 162 to amk int
– 265 no longer goes to amk int like 268
Random ideas for Yio Chu Kang Int that should work:
1. Construct bus park north of boarding berths, increasing interchange capacity.
2. Amend 45 & 268 to YCKBI. 268 will not serve AMK St 64 Industrial.
3. Convert 265 to Dual-Loop Feeder (Ang Mo Kio ↺ AMK Ave 10/St 62), replacing 268 deleted sectors.
4. Extend 169 to YCK via AMK Ave 8. Commuters from AMK MRT can board at pair of bus stops outside AMKBI. This is due to:
– 169 has lowest frequency of all trunks at AMKBI. Waiting at outdoor bus stops will be less troubling.
– 169 is TTS, which is already an operator at YCKBI.
– Free up AMKBI bus park space for 265 (which is by the egress).
45,265 & 268 should start here and 162 should extend to Sembawang Int and change to Sembawang-Yishun in exchange for 825.
what if this interchange was an extension to amk int, since both are found in ang mo kio estate. If thats the case:
– shift services 22, 45, 73, 265, 268 here
– shift service 162 to amk int
– 265 no longer goes to amk int like 268
Random ideas for Yio Chu Kang Int that should work:
1. Construct bus park north of boarding berths, increasing interchange capacity.
2. Amend 45 & 268 to YCKBI. 268 will not serve AMK St 64 Industrial.
3. Convert 265 to Dual-Loop Feeder (Ang Mo Kio ↺ AMK Ave 10/St 62), replacing 268 deleted sectors.
4. Extend 169 to YCK via AMK Ave 8. Commuters from AMK MRT can board at pair of bus stops outside AMKBI. This is due to:
– 169 has lowest frequency of all trunks at AMKBI. Waiting at outdoor bus stops will be less troubling.
– 169 is TTS, which is already an operator at YCKBI.
– Free up AMKBI bus park space for 265 (which is by the egress).