Route Extension for Service 965 to Buangkok & Amendment via WDL St 82
May 24

From Sunday, 24 May 2026, Tower Transit Bus Service 965 will be converted to a bi-directional service & amended as follows:
- Extended from Sengkang to Buangkok Int
via Sengkang East Way, Sengkang East Rd & Sengkang East Ave; - Amended via Woodlands Ave 5, Woodlands Ave 9, Woodlands St 82 & Woodlands Ave 4
skipping a section of Woodlands Ave 7
As such, Short Trip Service 965A would be amended accordingly via Woodlands St 82 towards Yishun. Terminating trip 965T would likely cease operations, with the last day of operations on Saturday 23 May 2026.
The daily first bus timing for Service 965 from Woodlands Temp Int will also be brought forward by 15 mins as follows:
| Operating Hours from Woodlands Temp Int | Weekdays & Saturdays | Sundays / Public Holidays |
| till 23 May 2026 | 05:30 – 22:40 | 05:45 – 22:40 |
| After 22:40 – 23:30, buses departing Woodlands Temp Int are renumbered as Service 965T which terminates at Sengkang Int | ||
| from 24 May 2026 | 05:15 – 23:30 | 05:30 – 23:30 |
Publicity Poster
7 thoughts on “Route Extension for Service 965 to Buangkok & Amendment via WDL St 82”
Leave a Reply
Interesting take for this amendment, however, I believe in the future when the RTS start its operations maybe possible to amend to the routes there as well, to complement 856? But the interesting turn is to my main road at Sengkang East Road.
would it be possible if 965 turns into Sembawang Ave and then Sembawang Road after Gambas Ave? it could serve Sembawang Shopping Centre. Also the amendment to put for Buangkok Int and Woodlands St 82 is an excellent idea! Bus 912 and 858 won’t have to be so dependent now and 965 will serve RP too
Good suggestion to serve SSC. Currently there is no direct bus from HDB precincts near Admiralty MRT other than the weekend shuttle service.
Possible but what for? SSC is such a slum mall, which Woodlands resident would want to visit it?
Was 965 amended to ply sengkang east road instead of compassvale drive & punggol rd cuz it duplicates 27?
that and they had to find a way to eliminate the long loop
The extension to buangkok and conversion to bidirectional was long-awaited. Finally its here, along with the woodlands amendment